SEXUAL EDUCATION IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

I think the most it should be is appropriate and innappropriate touching, but the parents should be forced to be a part of it to.

we shouldn't be teaching elemenatary school kids scientific shit. it takes the fun out of being naive and innocent. lets fuck these kids up when they're in middle school, not elementary school.

My mother explained sex to me when I was 3, because I asked where babies came from.

She told me santa, tooth fairy, and easter bunny were all fake.

I was never naive... never innocent... So I don't know if it's fun or not.

well, i was, and i tell you, it was fun. kids need to have a mighty imagination and a sense of being naive, or else when they grow up, they become too loserish and dull.


figure this, i would be on FH a lot more if i had been told while in kindergarden that all that shit was bullshit. look at my post count, i hardly spend time here (summer is just boring). although, sex was something that i learned both from my mom and from constant research (as a child). the thought fascinated me. why do you think i know so many positions and sex moves? i didn't even have sex yet (although, next year looks good, but can never be too sure).

Meh, my imagination is fine.

And unlike me, you have never been on the wrong side of the law, and aren't gun shy of dealing with mass number of people.



All in all, I did all I wanted to do really before I was 16, been to several nations, learned what I wanted, experienced so damn much, it is nice to just rest finally.

i've been on the wrong side of the law i sadly admit. something that i don't wish to talk about too much. luckily, i was never caught. but, never will i do something of the nature again. i respect our law enforcers, and of course, will become one.

and nothing more that i'd like to do then justifly kill a shit load of people, with a gun if around.

Yeah, unless you are arressted you aren't gonna be gun shy.

And cops should mind their own business, I was defending myself, what fuckin right do you have to arresst me?

Bah, but I suppose that is debatible.

i've known about sex ever since i saw pornography at a young age...
it all seemed to fall into place then

i saw porn when i was six. turned out we had the spice channel.

CarsitoPyg wrote:

i saw porn when i was six. turned out we had the spice channel.

oh you lucky son of a....
i think i was 3 or 2....somewhere in that phase

Really, it doesn't destroy you that I know of.

I guess having innocence would be nice, but if you never had it it just doesn't seem all that important.

Makes you look at the world differently, study people, and such.

psychokittyboy wrote:

Really, it doesn't destroy you that I know of.

I guess having innocence would be nice, but if you never had it it just doesn't seem all that important.

Makes you look at the world differently, study people, and such.

by innocence you mean virginity right?

Psychopsymon wrote:

psychokittyboy wrote:

Really, it doesn't destroy you that I know of.

I guess having innocence would be nice, but if you never had it it just doesn't seem all that important.

Makes you look at the world differently, study people, and such.

by innocence you mean virginity right?

No, I mean innocence of mind. You know, livin in a bubble of security provided by parental figures and lies.

i study people well. like i said, i really do well with the mentally ill, and i can always tell when someone's lying. plus, i've caused someone to commit suicide by getting into their heads.

good thing about innocence is a child's mind is unstable. it's up to the parents if they want to have children face reality at such a young age, not the schools.

That ain't studying people... that is simple manipulation.

I mean, study people. Social interaction, society as a whole, ones niche' in a society, etc.

well, i can't get emotional about others. i actually find it good for lots of people to die. but, of course, we must justify the action. you know, arrest who has to be arrested.

and, i can study people. i usually know what they're dealing with. but, i can't relate to many people, because i just can't get that emotional for others.

i don't want to become like others though, but i can make them think i am.

psychokittyboy wrote:

Psychopsymon wrote:

psychokittyboy wrote:

Really, it doesn't destroy you that I know of.

I guess having innocence would be nice, but if you never had it it just doesn't seem all that important.

Makes you look at the world differently, study people, and such.

by innocence you mean virginity right?

No, I mean innocence of mind. You know, livin in a bubble of security provided by parental figures and lies.

oh i get it

psychokittyboy wrote:

Yeah, unless you are arressted you aren't gonna be gun shy.

And cops should mind their own business, I was defending myself, what fuckin right do you have to arresst me?

Bah, but I suppose that is debatible.

debaitible? he threatned me so i blew a hole in his skull, i see no debate there.

I am in full support of using lethal force in such situations.

if you were convicted, then yes, they were wrong. but, if they arrived on scene, they have to arrest you. anyone can lie, and plenty do.

also, if they arrive while you're just kicking the shit out of someone, and they aren't fighting back (anymore in this case), then you are breaking the law. As a cooperative society, we must learn to only eliminate the threat. If you guys are fighting, he's down, and you're just still kicking and punching him, then you still have a case, but it's harder not to get convicted.

but the cops are doing the right thing by arresting someone who is "defending themselves". they aren't god, they don't know that.

plus, blame the judge if you do go to jail.

CarsitoPyg wrote:

if you were convicted, then yes, they were wrong. but, if they arrived on scene, they have to arrest you. anyone can lie, and plenty do.

also, if they arrive while you're just kicking the shit out of someone, and they aren't fighting back (anymore in this case), then you are breaking the law. As a cooperative society, we must learn to only eliminate the threat. If you guys are fighting, he's down, and you're just still kicking and punching him, then you still have a case, but it's harder not to get convicted.

but the cops are doing the right thing by arresting someone who is "defending themselves". they aren't god, they don't know that.

plus, blame the judge if you do go to jail.

I blame the cop for being the dumb fuck, stuck up ass hole he was... Officer Fischer was cool, but he wasn't the one who broke it up.

It isn't his call on whether you were defending yourself or not, in reality, you must be arrested.

if you do get convicted, no one to blame but the judge (or jury, if trialed by a jury).

CarsitoPyg wrote:

It isn't his call on whether you were defending yourself or not, in reality, you must be arrested.

if you do get convicted, no one to blame but the judge (or jury, if trialed by a jury).

Or him, because it called it a fuckin hate crime, THE GUY SUCKER PUNCHED ME!!!!

The cop can (and if a liberal) will add certain unneccessary enhancements. But, the judge or jury decides if you're guilty, not the cop.

I don't believe in hate crimes, and neither do 99% of the cops in Pembroke Pines. And through my experience, most cops in all of broward find it bullshit.

Usually, though, a prosecutor will add the hate crime enhancement. The cop just tells the story.

He told me what he thought it was, the bastard.

my parents had no need to explain that stuff to me
they just gave me full uncensord interwebz